Lawsuits Now Being Brought Against Governments’ Reckless Use of PCR Tests
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, March 10, 2021
BERLIN, Germany - Attorney, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M. recently issued a statement1 updating the legal efforts to hold governments around the world, and their associated directors of public health, accountable for using fraudulent COVID-19 PCR tests and the subsequent economic and societal damage caused by government overreaction to COVID-19 throughout 2020.
Lawsuits against government leaders are currently under way in Germany, United States and Canada. Rulings have already been handed down by courts in Portugal and Ecuador. The crux of the argument is the much-touted RT-PCR tests that have captivated the attention of the world community were based upon flawed science, constructed using theoretical computer models of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus before it was ever isolated and purified. It also states the RT-PCR tests were never designed to be used for diagnosing a disease since they are a bioengineering manufacturing process intended merely to artificially replicate copies of RNA strands. In the case of COVID-19, those tests were based on computer models, not actual virus RNA.
Dr. Fuellmich, who is licensed to practice law in both Germany, and California notes in his press release, “In a retraction paper, a score of highly regarded international scientists have called on the editors of the journal which published the PCR tests as a measurement method for infections to withdraw the mischief forthwith. This test is not only scientific nonsense, but was obviously designed to create as many false positives as possible and so spread panic in the world.”
That paper, entitled the Corman-Droston Review Report2 was composed by a team of scientists, epidemiologists and doctors. It was submitted to Eurosurveillance editorial board on November 27, 2020.
The reported showed numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19 - which is not much more deadly than the common, seasonal flu. “The danger presented by this allegedly new virus can be compared to that of influenza – this is the conclusion not only of studies by Prof. John Ioannidis of Stanford University but also the assessment of the World Health Organisation,” said Dr. Fuellmich. “The Drosten-PCR-Tests, which were devised in January 2020, are not remotely suitable for determining whether someone is infected or not, despite being recommended as the global Gold Standard for determining infection by the WHO; it should be noted that the leadership of this organisation is under the financial control of China and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He adds, “The WHO certainly has good employees – as too does the Robert-Koch Institute, despite its incompetent management.”
Dr. Fuellmich says a case against the government’s fraudulent use of the PCR test in Germany to artificially instill a state of fear and panic is currently pending on the cease-and-desist letter to Drosten in the Regional Court of Berlin.
“Together with a group of lawyers we are working on a number of further precedence case complaints, but above all (because this is faster and less expensive) also on many cease and desist letters against those in positions of responsibility. This way we obtain in effect something like a German class action.”
Meanwhile, in the U.S., on December 16, 2020, his US colleagues working with Robert F Kennedy, Jr´s Children’s Health Defense, submitted a PCR test complaint in New York on behalf of a number of plaintiffs.
In the first week of January, 2021, Dr. Fuellmich notes; “Canadian colleagues working with Michael Swinwood have submitted a class action. It is being added to, on the instructions of the court. The complainants initially represented are Indians, a group of small business people and a representative of disabled people. In contrast to all complaints submitted to date, this complaint narrates briefly the historical background of the power structures behind the Davos clique which have been constructed over the course of centuries.”
Late last year, an appeal court in Portugal ruled that the PCR tests are not able to ascertain infection let alone illness. “This judgment is a slap in the face for the German administrative courts, which were forced to concede that PCR tests cannot ascertain the presence of infection.”
A judgment pronounced on January 2, 2021, by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador ruled that all anti-Corona measures to date are based on mere conjectures without any basis in fact. “After nine months it should finally be possible for the acting politicians to communicate clear, evidence-based assertions and base their measures on these. But since this has not happened, all the measures are unconstitutional.”
Lawsuits aren't limited to the misuse of the PCR tests. Further lawsuits are being drafted to combat the use of the experimental RNA-altering vaccines now being foisted on an unsuspecting public. “Parallel to all these efforts, the Italian lawyer Dr. Renate Holzeisen is working with us and experts on a lawsuit against the EU Commission to have its approval of vaccines declared null & void – vaccines which are de facto untested and highly dangerous – in the case of the manufacturers Bioentech/Pfizer and Moderna, these are prohibited genetic experiments on humans. Meanwhile, the superbly versed and hard-hitting anti-Mafia public prosecutors are investigating the WHO and its Italian backers. In France work is progressing on a complaint to the Court for Human Rights.”
notes:
1. http://enformtk.u-aizu.ac.jp/howard/fuellmich/
2. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/