Back to Fort Fairfield Journal



Two Teenage Boys Die Suddenly After Second Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 “vaccine”

Official State Autopsies Conclude Both Deaths Caused by the Experimental COVID-19 “vaccine”


By: David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal,  July 27, 2022

The American College of Pathologists recently published a report on the autopsies of two teenage boys who both died suddenly after receiving the second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 “vaccine.” The findings concluded both deaths were a result of the toxic effects of the “vaccine.”1

The report was written by Dr. James Gill, M.D.; Dr. Randy Tashjan, M.D.; and Dr. Emily Duncanson, M.D. These doctors are not fringe, anti-vax quacks as the left wing news media likes to label anyone providing information detrimental to the narrative on the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Dr. Gill is from the Connecticut Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and the Department of Pathology at Yale University. Dr. Tashjan is from the Wayne County Medical Examiner’s Office in Detroit Michigan; and Dr. Duncanson is with the Jesse E. Edwards Registry of Cardiovascular Disease in St. Paul, Minnesota.

The doctors examined the autopsy results of two teenage boys, one from Connecticut and the other from Michigan, who both died shortly after receiving their second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine.”

Neither boy had any pre-existing conditions that would have contributed to their death and both tested negative for any signs of SARS-Cov-2 at death.

Their report states, “The results of autopsies for two teenage boys who were found dead in bed 3 and 4 days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are presented. Both boys were pronounced dead at home without attempted resuscitation...Both teenage boys had similar clinical presentations with no obvious cardiac symptoms. Their histopathology does not demonstrate a typical myocarditis. In those instances, one sees lymphocytic (or giant cell) infiltrates with adjacent myocyte necrosis; changes such as hypereosinophilic myocytes and contraction bands are absent. In these two post-vaccination instances, there are areas of contraction bands and hypereosinophilic myocytes distinct from the inflammation. This injury pattern is instead similar to what is seen in the myocardium of patients who are clinically diagnosed with Takotsubo, toxic, or “stress” cardiomyopathy, which is a temporary myocardial injury that can develop in patients with extreme physical, chemical, or sometimes emotional stressors. Both teenage boys had similar clinical presentations with no obvious cardiac symptoms.”

Neither boy had extreme physical or emotional stressors at the time of their death, so the conclusion was their deaths were chemically related to the COVID “vaccines” they both received.

One of the primary side effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” is myocarditis—an inflammation of the heart muscle. Myocarditis can lead, in many cases, to Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). An article published in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living cited a study that found “1,626 cases of myocarditis in a national passive surveillance report in the U.S., rates within 7 days after vaccination exceeded the expected rates across multiple age and sex strata and were highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and in young men...While the biological mechanisms are not yet clear, the same adverse events were attributed to use of the smallpox vaccine in adults.”2

All of the COVID-19 “vaccines” were rushed through production under former President Trump’s “Warp Speed” initiative. Safety testing was scant and all testing of the experimental drugs was conducted by the same drug companies who would be profiting from the sale of those drugs masquerading as “vaccines” for COVID-19. Many irresponsible politicians then hastily mandated the use of these “vaccines” in health care and military settings while large corporations rushed to get on board the media’s vaccine bandwagon and mandate their employees receive them as well, before any long-term safety data was available.

That data is now coming in and it doesn’t look good for the experimental “vaccines,” leading many to conclude that politicians, corporations and the media should not be involved in influencing personal health care decisions.